Tony Wagner uses a specific word when he talks about curiosity. Not gift. Not talent. Not personality. Muscle.

He means something precise by it. A muscle develops through exercise. It strengthens when it is used and weakens when it is not. It is not fixed. It is not inherited. It responds to conditions.

I think of curiosity as a muscle. The average five-year-old asks a hundred questions a day. But then something happens we call it school. Because the longer kids are in school, the less curious they become, the fewer questions they ask.

Tony Wagner — more from Tony Wagner

The decline is not natural. It is the result of an environment that rewards right answers and discourages unresolved questions. School does not make learners less curious because they are growing up. It makes them less curious because it stops exercising that particular muscle.

the same is true of empathy

Wagner speaks specifically about curiosity, but the logic applies equally to empathy. And it is worth being precise here, because "empathy" is a word that gets used loosely in education conversations.

Empathy is not a feeling you have about someone. It is a practice of attention. It requires deliberately setting aside your own frame of reference long enough to ask what someone else's world is actually like, on their terms, not yours. That takes effort. It takes practice. It is, in every meaningful sense, a muscle.

Learners who have regular encounters with real people whose lives are genuinely different from their own -- who are asked to observe before they conclude, to notice before they explain -- develop this capacity differently than learners who only encounter other people as illustrations in a textbook.

what atrophies curiosity in school

The structure of most formal education is built around a simple transaction: here is the question, find the right answer. That transaction is efficient. It is also, Wagner argues, systematically damaging to curiosity.

When every question has a predetermined answer, there is no incentive to ask different questions. When the goal is always to converge on the correct response, the habit of wondering -- of following a thought into unfamiliar territory before knowing where it leads -- has no room to develop.

By the time a learner is in high school, the muscle that was doing a hundred repetitions a day at age five is rarely asked to work at all. The result is learners who are good at answering questions and genuinely underprepared for asking them.

what exercises the muscle

The conditions that develop curiosity and empathy share a common structure. Something genuinely unfamiliar. Time to observe it without being told what it means. The experience of your own attention producing something no one else produced. And the discovery that what you noticed was worth noticing.

A wordless film does all of this in a few minutes. You see a real person in a real situation you have never encountered. No narration tells you what to make of it. You watch. You notice. And then, when someone asks what you saw, your answer is genuinely yours.

Over many such encounters -- across many different stories, many different worlds -- the habit builds. The learner who regularly practices noticing before concluding becomes someone for whom that practice is natural. The muscle has developed.

it's really cool to see someone's different point of view in a different part of the world and how they live their lives. it's making me more curious on the lives of different people.

a learner, after watching a wordless film — more learner voices

the relationship between the two

Curiosity and empathy are not the same thing. But they develop together under similar conditions, and they reinforce each other.

A genuinely curious learner wants to understand what something is actually like, not just what it appears to be. That wanting is the start of empathy. And an empathic learner who has practiced sitting with the complexity of another person's world develops a deeper curiosity about it -- not just what is visible, but what would have to be true for this life to make sense on its own terms.

Wagner describes the outcome he hopes for: not just learners who are interested in different worlds, but learners who want to make a difference for those worlds. That move -- from noticing to caring to acting -- is what both these muscles, worked together, can produce.

For more on how this connects to the academic subjects you already teach, see /curiosity-in-education and /empathy-in-education. For Tony Wagner in his own words, the full conversations are at /tony-wagner.

Jordan Kassalow on VisionSpring, Taniya's story, and clear vision for every child · 3:13 · the VisionSpring partnership